Double sided coin1/5/2024 ![]() Players would then flip the shell in the air and call the correct side, just like we do now! The other side of the shell would remain its original color. It is believed that players would cover one side of a shell with a black or very dark brown substance called “black pitch” - a resinous goo which is obtained from trees. While the actual origin of the coin toss is up for debate, many historians believe it originated in Ancient Greece. “Pile” comes from a Middle English term which means “reverse of a coin.” In Peru, the game is called “face or seal,” even to this day! In ancient China, the game was known as “ship or head.” This is because ancient Chinese coins were minted with a ship on one side and a head on the other. Later in history, the British called the game “cross and pile.” At the time, many coins depicted a cross on one side. The outcomes of those flips were considered to be legally binding. During this time, flips were utilized to make some very serious decisions, including those related to criminality, property, and marriage. Julius Caesar himself endorsed the coin flip in 49 BC when he began minting coins which depicted his name. During this period, Romans called the game “navia aut caput,” which translates to “ship or head.” This is because some Roman coins had a ship on one side and the head (or “bust”) of the emperor on the other side. More on World Kitchen Club to come.Metal coins were first manufactured as early as the 7th century BC, however, the first accounts of the practice of coin flipping can be found in ancient Rome. I am happy to announce that we have launched the online personal interaction concept as a new business, #Worldkitchenclub ( sought advice and support from my team at #HiPower ( which is a group of executive women who support each other to stretch our comfort zones and achieve great things. The power of network gives me the strength to get out of my comfort zone. My first step on that journey harkens back to a previous posting where I described how Jenny Leung ( ) and I set-up a few cooking classes for our chef friends that were out of work due to Covid. We connected the chefs to our friends and family using Zoom. We connected people in Europe, the US, and in Asia for a couple hours of good food, good chat, and good will. With more than 35% of the workforce in the United States working remotely, how can we bring inclusion beyond the daily video calls and glue the team together? I am going to bring positive change to other users’ technology experience, and do what I can to promote personal engagement as a supplement to our technology. Technology should be a tool, and not a replacement for human interaction. At that moment, I began to think hard about whether technology was actually a roadblock to real and genuine communication. While dining with a colleague, we both spent most of a nice dinner staring at our phones, and responding to Ding Ding text messages. On its face, technology facilitates near-instant communication, and that’s a good thing, right? But is it now too easy to pop off a quick one liner text message or send an abrupt email message in the heat of the moment?Īn “icing on the cake” moment for me was a pre-Covid business trip to India. It is super simple to connect with people any time from anywhere in the world or in the other room in the SAME HOUSE. Paradoxically, while engaged with Silicon Valley’s best and brightest, I found myself wondering whether technology has brought harm to society in terms of limiting the face-to-face social interaction that brings people closer together? Has technology turned us into keyboard warrior communicators? I have been discussing with friends and colleagues how technology has driven such huge advances in business, but may have also created a not-so-hidden dark side.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |